Current:Home > ContactAn appeals court finds Florida's social media law unconstitutional -前500条预览:
An appeals court finds Florida's social media law unconstitutional
View
Date:2025-04-17 23:09:39
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. — A Florida law intended to punish social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter is an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment, a federal appeals court ruled Monday, dealing a major victory to companies who had been accused by GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis of discriminating against conservative thought.
A three-judge panel of the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously concluded that it was overreach for DeSantis and the Republican-led Florida Legislature to tell the social media companies how to conduct their work under the Constitution's free speech guarantee.
"Put simply, with minor exceptions, the government can't tell a private person or entity what to say or how to say it," said Circuit Judge Kevin Newsom, an appointee of former President Donald Trump, in the opinion. "We hold that it is substantially likely that social media companies — even the biggest ones — are private actors whose rights the First Amendment protects."
The ruling upholds a similar decision by a Florida federal district judge on the law, which was signed by DeSantis in 2021. It was part of an overall conservative effort to portray social media companies as generally liberal in outlook and hostile to ideas outside of that viewpoint, especially from the political right.
"Some of these massive, massive companies in Silicon Valley are exerting a power over our population that really has no precedent in American history," DeSantis said during a May 2021 bill-signing ceremony. "One of their major missions seems to be suppressing ideas."
The panel found that content moderation and curation is constitutionally protected
However, the appeals panel ruled that the tech companies' actions were protected, with Judge Newsom writing that Facebook, Twitter, TikTok and others are "engaged in constitutionally protected expressive activity when they moderate and curate the content that they disseminate on their platforms."
There was no immediate response to emails Monday afternoon from DeSantis' press secretary or communications director on the ruling. DeSantis is running for reelection this year and eyeing a potential run for the 2024 GOP presidential nomination. He was the first governor to sign a bill like this into law, although similar ones have been proposed in other states.
One of those, in Texas, was allowed to go into effect by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, and the tech companies involved there are asking for emergency U.S. Supreme Court review on whether to block it. No decision on that was immediately released.
The Computer & Communications Industry Association, a nonprofit group representing tech and communications companies, said the ruling represents a victory for internet users and free speech in general — especially as it relates to potentially offensive content.
"When a digital service takes action against problematic content on its own site — whether extremism, Russian propaganda, or racism and abuse — it is exercising its own right to free expression," said CCIA President Matt Schruers in a statement.
As enacted, the law would give Florida's attorney general authority to sue companies under the state's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. It would also allow individual Floridians to sue social media companies for up to $100,000 if they feel they've been treated unfairly.
The bill targeted social media platforms that have more than 100 million monthly users, which include online giants as Twitter and Facebook. But lawmakers carved out an exception for the Walt Disney Co. and their apps by including that theme park owners wouldn't be subject to the law.
The law would require large social media companies to publish standards on how it decides to "censor, deplatform, and shadow ban."
But the appeals court rejected nearly all of the law's mandates, save for a few lesser provisions in the law.
"Social media platforms exercise editorial judgment that is inherently expressive. When platforms choose to remove users or posts, deprioritize content in viewers' feeds or search results, or sanction breaches of their community standards, they engage in First-Amendment-protected activity," Newsom wrote for the court.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Ryan Reynolds' Deadpool mocks Marvel movies in exclusive deleted scene
- Northern lights forecast: Aurora borealis may appear in multiple US states, NOAA says
- Hoda Kotb announces 'Today' show exit in emotional message: 'Time for me to turn the page'
- Average rate on 30
- Military recruiting rebounds after several tough years, but challenges remain
- It's not just fans: A's players have eyes on their own Oakland Coliseum souvenirs, too
- Sen. Raphael Warnock is working on children’s book inspired by the story of Jesus feeding the 5,000
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- Court throws out manslaughter charge against clerk in Detroit gas station shooting
Ranking
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- The great supermarket souring: Why Americans are mad at grocery stores
- California Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoes bill to help Black families reclaim taken land
- How Halle Berry Ended Up Explaining Menopause to Mike Tyson
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Bill to boost Social Security for public workers heads to a vote
- LinkedIn is using your data to train generative AI models. Here's how to opt out.
- 2 hurt in IED explosion at Santa Barbara County courthouse, 1 person in custody
Recommendation
Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
FBI seizes NYC mayor’s phone ahead of expected unsealing of indictment
Vanessa Williams talks 'Survivor,' Miss America controversy and working with Elton John
Wendy's is offering $1 Frostys until the end of September
What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
How Rooted Books in Nebraska is combatting book bans: 'We really, really care'
Man charged with killing 13-year-old Detroit girl whose body remains missing
Best Gifts for Studio Ghibli Fans in 2024: Inspired Picks from Howl’s Moving Castle, Spirited Away & More