Current:Home > News13 Reasons Why’s Tommy Dorfman Reveals She Was Paid Less Than $30,000 for Season One -前500条预览:
13 Reasons Why’s Tommy Dorfman Reveals She Was Paid Less Than $30,000 for Season One
View
Date:2025-04-18 21:11:35
Tommy Dorfman isn't holding back when it comes to her salary on 13 Reasons Why.
In light of the ongoing SAG-AFTRA strike, the actress disclosed how much she made on first season of the popular Netflix series, in which she starred as Ryan Shaver from 2017-2020 before publicly transitioning in 2021.
"my earnings for the entire first season of 13 reasons why were $29,953.24 prior to agency and manager fees (20%) and taxes," Dorfman wrote on Threads July 24. "8 episodes over six months."
Dorfman said that despite working round-the-clock and being a prominent character on the show, she encountered challenges. As the 31-year-old explained, "i did all of the promo and had KEY ART for this show, flew round trip from NYC to SF to shoot for every episode, was kept for days without pay/working. i barely qualified for insurance."
Furthermore, Dorfman reflected on the show's success amid her financial burdens.
"within the first 28 days of release, the show's season 1 garnered a total of 476 million view hours," she said. "this is why we strike."
E! News has reached out to Netflix for comment and has not heard back.
Dorfman's message comes nearly two weeks into the SAG-AFTRA strike against the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers. The strike went into effect on July 14 after the union voted unanimously to picket against the film and television studios—their first strike since 1980.
"It came with great sadness that we came to this crossroads," SAG-AFTRA president Fran Drescher said at a press conference, "but we have no choice."
Click here for a breakdown on the SAG-AFTRA strike, and what it means for your favorite shows.
(Comcast, which owns E! News' parent company NBCUniversal, is one of the entertainment companies represented by the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers.)
For the latest breaking news updates, click here to download the E! News AppveryGood! (221)
Related
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- The EPA says Americans could save $1 trillion on gas under its auto emissions plan
- Search continues for 9-month-old baby swept away in Pennsylvania flash flooding
- Child dies from brain-eating amoeba after visiting hot spring, Nevada officials say
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- When AI works in HR
- About 1 in 10 young adults are vaping regularly, CDC report finds
- Chipotle and Sweetgreen's short-lived beef over a chicken burrito bowl gets resolved
- Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
- In the Latest Rights of Nature Case, a Tribe Is Suing Seattle on Behalf of Salmon in the Skagit River
Ranking
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- Peter Thomas Roth Deal: Get 2 Rose Stem Cell Masks for the Price of 1
- A big misconception about debt — and how to tackle it
- ‘Stripped of Everything,’ Survivors of Colorado’s Most Destructive Fire Face Slow Recoveries and a Growing Climate Threat
- Head of the Federal Aviation Administration to resign, allowing Trump to pick his successor
- Gloomy global growth, Tupperware troubles, RIP HBO Max
- Will There Be a Barbie Movie Sequel? Margot Robbie Says...
- Nikki Reed Gives Birth, Welcomes Baby No. 2 With Ian Somerhalder
Recommendation
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
Why K-pop's future is in crisis, according to its chief guardian
Proof Pregnant Kourtney Kardashian and Travis Barker Already Chose Their Baby Boy’s Name
Why sanctions don't work — but could if done right
Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
Dylan Mulvaney Calls Out Bud Light’s Lack of Support Amid Ongoing “Bullying and Transphobia”
In the Democrats’ Budget Package, a Billion Tons of Carbon Cuts at Stake
It cost $22 billion to rescue two failed banks. Now the question is who will pay