Current:Home > reviewsTradeEdge Exchange:This Social Security plan will increase taxes, and Americans want it -前500条预览:
TradeEdge Exchange:This Social Security plan will increase taxes, and Americans want it
Rekubit Exchange View
Date:2025-04-11 11:42:03
Social Security's trust funds are TradeEdge Exchangeexpected to be depleted in 2034, according to a recent Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report. This could lead to substantial benefit cuts if the government doesn't find a way to increase the program's funding. But finding a solution most people can agree on isn't easy.
Some have proposed raising Social Security payroll taxes. This would leave workers with less money to spend today or save for their futures, so it's understandably unpopular with a lot of people. But there's another tax-increasing reform that's actually gotten a lot of support from people in both political camps.
It would make the wealthy pay more
Most people pay Social Security payroll taxes on all of their income each year, but this isn't the case for high earners. In 2024, only the first $168,600 a person earns is subject to these taxes. Anything over this amount is not, but it also doesn't help increase your Social Security benefit in retirement.
Many believe that these high earners should pay more in Social Security taxes to help sustain the program. Some have argued for doing away with the ceiling on Social Security payroll taxes altogether, forcing everyone to pay the 12.4% tax — split evenly between employee and employer — on all their wages.
There's another proposal that suggests carving out a "donut hole," if you will, that would eliminate Social Security payroll taxes for those over the $168,600 ceiling (which is itself adjusted for inflation annually) and then implement it again for those with annual wages over $400,000.
For example, if this system were in place today, someone earning $200,000 per year would only pay taxes on the first $168,600 they earned. The remaining $31,400 wouldn't be subject to the Social Security payroll tax. If someone earned $450,000, they would pay Social Security payroll taxes on their first $168,600 and on the $50,000 over the $400,000 mark.
A recent University of Maryland study looked at the opinions of adults in six key swing states in the 2024 election, and found that a majority of them were strongly in favor of this option. Overall, 87% supported this idea, and the percentages in favor were pretty close among Republicans, Democrats and Independents. But that doesn't mean it's going to happen.
How this would affect Social Security
This reform would have a significant effect on Social Security's future, but it wouldn't be enough to ensure its future solvency. The survey revealed that if it were enacted, it would reduce the funding shortfall by about 60%. So at best, this would just kick the problem down the road a little way.
To ensure Social Security's stability for decades to come, the government would have to do more. There's likely no one solution that would fix the problem. It's probably going to come down to a combination of strategies that either increase the program's funding or reduce the benefits payable to retirees, disabled workers, surviving spouses and their families.
Therein lies the reason no one has come up with a magic fix for Social Security yet. The "donut hole" approach to Social Security payroll taxes appeals to a lot of people because it's not going to cause the average worker any financial hardship. But that's not the case for a lot of the other proposals on the table.
Increasing the Social Security payroll tax rate would leave workers with less money to spend today. Raising the full retirement age (FRA), as some have suggested, would essentially act as a benefit cut, because workers would face steeper early claiming penalties than applicants do now. Reducing benefits would also compromise the financial security of many retirees.
So there aren't easy answers. But the government has to decide on something within the next few years. When it does, we will all have to take a hard look at our retirement plans and adjust accordingly. The best thing workers can do right now is to save what they can on their own, so they're less dependent on Social Security in retirement.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets" »
veryGood! (27865)
Related
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Members of the public explain why they waited for hours to see Trump arraigned: This is historic
- Vegas Golden Knights cruise by Florida Panthers to capture first Stanley Cup
- Woman, 28, arrested for posing as 17-year-old student at Louisiana high school
- Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
- All the Dazzling Details Behind Beyoncé's Sun-Washed Blonde Look for Her Renaissance Tour
- Love Coffee? It’s Another Reason to Care About Climate Change
- Decade of Climate Evidence Strengthens Case for EPA’s Endangerment Finding
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- FDA moves to ease restrictions on blood donations for men who have sex with men
Ranking
- Could your smelly farts help science?
- State Clean Air Agencies Lose $112 Million in EPA Budget-Cutting
- Iowa Alzheimer's care facility is fined $10,000 after pronouncing a living woman dead
- A baby spent 36 days at an in-network hospital. Why did her parents get a huge bill?
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- The EPA Once Said Fracking Did Not Cause Widespread Water Contamination. Not Anymore
- Megan Fox Says She's Never, Ever Loved Her Body
- Clean Energy Investment ‘Bank’ Has Bipartisan Support, But No Money
Recommendation
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
Portland Bans New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure in Stand Against Climate Change
Most Americans say overturning Roe was politically motivated, NPR/Ipsos poll finds
Decade of Climate Evidence Strengthens Case for EPA’s Endangerment Finding
Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
U.S. Electric Car Revolution to Go Forward, With or Without Congress
Government Shutdown Raises Fears of Scientific Data Loss, Climate Research Delays
Agent: Tori Bowie, who died in childbirth, was not actively performing home birth when baby started to arrive