Current:Home > ContactAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -前500条预览:
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-14 10:14:57
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (13916)
Related
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- U.S. Intelligence Officials Warn Climate Change Is a Worldwide Threat
- ICN Expands Summer Journalism Institute for Teens
- 'All the Beauty and the Bloodshed' chronicles Nan Goldin's career of art and activism
- Angelina Jolie nearly fainted making Maria Callas movie: 'My body wasn’t strong enough'
- Video shows man struck by lightning in Woodbridge Township, New Jersey, then saved by police officer
- Over-the-counter Narcan will save lives, experts say. But the cost will affect access
- In Battle to Ban Energy-Saving Light Bulbs, GOP Defends ‘Personal Liberty’
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- High-Stakes Wind Farm Drama in Minnesota Enters Final Act
Ranking
- McConnell absent from Senate on Thursday as he recovers from fall in Capitol
- In Charleston, S.C., Politics and Budgets Get in the Way of Cutting Carbon Emissions
- Live Nation's hidden ticket fees will no longer be hidden, event company says
- Which type of eye doctor do you need? Optometrists and ophthalmologists face off
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- NYC Mayor Eric Adams Calls Out Reckless and Irresponsible Paparazzi After Harry and Meghan Incident
- Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Involved in Near Catastrophic 2-Hour Car Chase With Paparazzi
- Which 2024 Republican candidates would pardon Trump if they won the presidency? Here's what they're saying.
Recommendation
Bodycam footage shows high
Which 2024 Republican candidates would pardon Trump if they won the presidency? Here's what they're saying.
Ukrainian soldiers benefit from U.S. prosthetics expertise but their war is different
Billie Eilish and Boyfriend Jesse Rutherford Break Up After Less Than a Year Together
California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
Spain approves menstrual leave, teen abortion and trans laws
The glam makeovers of Pakistan's tractors show how much farmers cherish them
Over-the-counter Narcan will save lives, experts say. But the cost will affect access