Current:Home > StocksAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -前500条预览:
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-17 07:05:57
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (6)
Related
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- Love long strolls in the cemetery? This 19th-century NJ church for sale could be your home
- Australia says its navy divers were likely injured by the Chinese navy’s ‘unsafe’ use of sonar
- Climate change is hurting coral worldwide. But these reefs off the Texas coast are thriving
- Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
- A toddler accidentally fires his mother’s gun in Walmart, police say. She now faces charges
- Michigan makes college football history in win over Maryland
- How do you make peace with your shortcomings? This man has an answer
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- Bangladesh’s top court upholds decision barring largest Islamist party from elections
Ranking
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Amazon Has Thousands of Black Friday 2023 Deals, These Are the 50 You Can’t Miss
- Why Americans feel gloomy about the economy despite falling inflation and low unemployment
- He lost $200,000 when FTX imploded last year. He's still waiting to get it back
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Gunman kills 1, then is fatally shot by police at New Hampshire psychiatric hospital
- Climate change is hurting coral worldwide. But these reefs off the Texas coast are thriving
- In march on Jerusalem, thousands press Israeli government to do more to free hostages held in Gaza
Recommendation
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
Estonia’s Kallas is reelected to lead party despite a scandal over husband’s Russia business ties
A Chinese man is extradited from Morocco to face embezzlement charges in Shanghai
Sugar prices are rising worldwide after bad weather tied to El Nino damaged crops in Asia
Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
Travis Kelce's Old Tweets Turned into a Song by Jimmy Fallon on The Tonight Show
A law that launched 2,500 sex abuse suits is expiring. It’s left a trail of claims vs. celebs, jails
In barely getting past Maryland, Michigan raises questions for upcoming Ohio State clash